print this pageBibliography
1. Bassi, L.J. (1995). Stimulating employment and increasing opportunity for the current work force. In D.S. Nightengale & R. H. Haveman (Eds.), The Work Alternative: Welfare Reform and the Politics of the Job Market (pp. 137-156). Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.
2. Berkowitz, E. (1987). Disabled Policy: America's Programs for the Disabled. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
3. Dejong, G., & Batavia, A. (1990). The Americans with Disabilities Act and the current state of U.S. disability policy. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 1(3), 65-74.
4. DeJong, G., & O'Day, B. (1996). Cross-cutting issues in disability policy and services and their implications for disability research. Washington, DC: National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
5. Hennessey, J., & Mueller, S. (1994). Work efforts of disabled worker beneficiaries: Preliminary findings of the new beneficiary survey. Social Security Bulletin, 57(3), 42-51.
6. Kamkar, M., & Tenney, F. (1991). Factors affecting SSDI beneficiaries' return to work. Journal of Rehabilitation Administration, 15(1), 143-147.
7. Louis Harris & Associates. (1986). The ICD survey of disabled Americans: Bringing disabled Americans into the mainstream. New York: International Center for the Disabled.
8. Louis Harris & Associates. (1994). Survey of Americans with disabilities. New York: Author.
9. Louis Harris & Associates. (1998). Survey of Americans with disabilities. New York: Author.
10. Martin, D., Conley, R., & Noble, J. (1995). The Americans with Disabilities Act and disability benefits policy: Some research topics and issues. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 6(2), 1-16.
11. National Association of Rehabilitation Facilities. (1992). Position paper on amendment of the Rehabilitation Act. Washington, DC: Author.
12. National Council on Disability. (1997). Return to work for people with disabilities: Action proposals for the 105th Congress. Washington, DC: Author.
13. National Council on Independent Living. (1992). Testimony on reauthorization of the Rehabilitation Act (Senate Committee on Education and Labor, Subcommittee on Disability). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
14. Ruth, D., Associate Director, Employment Support Institute, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond VA. (1997, March 20). Memorandum to B. O'Day.
15. Schaffer, D. (1991). Tax incentives. In T. West (Ed.), The Americans with Disabilities Act: From policy to practice (pp. 293-312). New York: Milbank Memorial Fund.
16. Social Security Act, Ch. 531, 49 Stat. 620 (1935) (Codified as amended in scattered sections of 42 U.S.C.).
17. Social Security Administration. (1991, June). Red book on work incentives: A summary guide to Social Security and Supplemental Security work incentives for people with disabilities. Washington, DC: Author.
18. Tilly, C. (1996). Half a job: Bad and good part-time jobs in the changing labor market. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
19. Trupin, L., Sebesta, D.S., Yelin, E.H., & LaPlante, M.P. (1997). Trends in labor force participation among persons with disabilities, 1983-1994. Disability Statistics Report, (10). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
20. U.S. Department of Commerce Bureau of the Census. (1990). Labor force status and other characteristics of persons with a work disability. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1993). Vocational rehabilitation: Evidence for federal program's effectiveness is mixed (Doc no. PEMD-93-19). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
22. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1996a). Social Security disability programs lag in promoting return to work (Doc no. GAO/T-HEHS-96-147). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
23. U.S. General Accounting Office. (1996b). SSA disability-program redesign necessary to encourage return to work (Doc no. GAO/HEHS-96-62). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
24. Watson, S. D. (1993a). Holistic policy-making: Neo-liberalism as illustrated by the women's and disability rights movements. Policy Studies Journal, 21(4), 752-764.
25. Wolffe, K. E., Roessler, R. T., & Schriner, K. F. (1992, April). Employment concerns of people with blindness or visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 86(4), 185-187.